Valusage Business Advisors
Feasibility and Financial Modelling8 min read

UAE Feasibility Study Terms of Reference: Commissioning and Model Review

Editorial responsibility: Valusage Advisory Team (Editorial Practice) · Reviewed by Valusage Business Advisors Technical Practice (Technical Practice)

Direct answer

A UAE feasibility-study terms of reference should define the decision, options, evidence standard, market and operating scope, financial-model structure, scenarios, deliverables, responsibilities, exclusions and review criteria before analysis begins. That control prevents a study from becoming an optimistic narrative and gives management a basis for accepting, revising or rejecting the work.

Decision graphic

From evidence and assumptions to a decision-ready model

Model architecture

1Market inputs
2Operating model
3Cash and returns

Sensitivity heatmap

LowerBaseHigherHigher cost
Rework
Conditional
Capacity
Base cost
Downside
Base case
Upside
Lower cost
Stop
Review
Scale
The matrix labels decision conditions rather than predicting results. Each live study requires sourced assumptions, transparent formulas and management-approved scenarios. Percentages and charts are illustrative control views, not client performance claims.

This article focuses on commissioning and reviewing the work. It does not repeat the business plan, feasibility study and financial model comparison or the separate guide to feasibility-study cost drivers.

Define the decision and alternatives State what management will decide, the options being compared, the investment horizon, constraints and conditions that would stop or reshape the proposal. Separate concept validation from lender, investor or board documentation.

Specify the evidence plan List available internal data, official or published sources, management assumptions, interviews and any separately authorised field work. Record the source, date, limitation and owner for each material assumption so a reviewer can distinguish evidence from judgment.

Define the model architecture Require transparent inputs, operating drivers, revenue, direct and fixed costs, staffing, capital expenditure, working capital, funding, profit and loss, cash flow, balance sheet where relevant, break-even and scenario controls. The model should expose dependencies and avoid hard-coded conclusions.

Agree the sensitivity questions Identify the variables most likely to change the decision: launch timing, demand, price, capacity, margin, staffing, capital cost, collection timing or funding. Test combinations rather than relying on a single-variable upside case.

Set acceptance criteria The final review should test source traceability, formula integrity, internal consistency, scenario behavior, cash before break-even, capacity constraints, exclusions and unresolved decisions. Acceptance means the agreed work is complete and reviewable, not that the project will succeed.

Professional boundary A feasibility study evaluates available evidence and stated assumptions. It is not assurance, regulated investment advice or a guarantee of financing, investment success or financial performance.

Professional boundary

This article is general information. It is not a filing opinion, legal advice, audit conclusion, investment recommendation or guarantee of authority acceptance or commercial outcome.

What belongs in feasibility-study terms of reference?+

Define the decision, options, evidence, scope, model structure, scenarios, deliverables, responsibilities, exclusions, timetable and acceptance criteria.

Should the client receive the editable financial model?+

The written scope should state whether the editable model, assumptions, formulas, scenario controls and supporting source register are included.

Does accepting a feasibility study mean the project will succeed?+

No. Acceptance confirms that the agreed analysis is complete and reviewable; market, execution, financing and other conditions may change.

Valusage email updates

Receive related Valusage guidance

Original summaries with official sources and practical context. Confirm by email. Unsubscribe at any time.

Contextual advisory review

Define the feasibility decision and evidence plan

Describe the entity, decision, deadline and evidence available. The service, enquiry and article path accompany the request. No engagement begins until scope, responsibilities, timing, exclusions and fees are agreed in writing.

Review the related service →

Contextual enquiry

Define the feasibility decision and evidence plan

Tell us the outcome, deadline and current position. The selected service context is retained with your request so the right scope can be reviewed.

What would you like to request?

Selected service

Feasibility Studies and Financial Modelling

We will review the requirement and contact you to discuss fit, scope and next steps. Submitting this form does not create an engagement. Do not include passwords, tax records or personal documents.